Validasi Awal Instrumen Spiritual Coping pada Mahasiswa Menggunakan Confirmatory Factor Analysis Berbasis CB-SEM

Penulis

  • Fawwaz Adzansyah Islamy Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Herdian Herdian Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Retno Dwiyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/jpkws.v4i02.3562

Kata Kunci:

Spiritual Coping, Mahasiswa, Validasi Instrumen, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CB-SEM

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan validasi awal Instrumen Spiritual Coping Mahasiswa menggunakan Confirmatory Factor Analysis berbasis Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain validasi instrumen. Partisipan penelitian berjumlah 162 mahasiswa yang dipilih menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Instrumen awal terdiri atas 24 item yang disusun berdasarkan empat dimensi teoritis, yaitu Personal, Religius, Sosial, dan Eksistensial. Validitas isi diuji menggunakan Aiken’s V, sedangkan validitas konstruk dianalisis melalui CFA berbasis CB-SEM dengan bantuan SmartPLS. Hasil uji validitas isi menunjukkan bahwa seluruh item memiliki nilai Aiken’s V antara 0,81 sampai 1,00, sehingga dinyatakan layak secara isi. Hasil CFA awal menunjukkan bahwa model empat dimensi belum memenuhi kriteria goodness of fit secara memadai. Setelah dilakukan evaluasi indikator, dimensi Personal dikeluarkan dari model karena tidak memiliki dukungan loading yang cukup. Model akhir terdiri atas tiga dimensi, yaitu Religius, Sosial, dan Eksistensial, dengan masing-masing tiga indikator. Model akhir menunjukkan goodness of fit yang memadai, dengan nilai Chi-square/df = 1,828, RMSEA = 0,071, SRMR = 0,055, GFI = 0,944, TLI = 0,917, dan CFI = 0,945. Seluruh indikator akhir memiliki loading di atas 0,50 dan validitas diskriminan terpenuhi berdasarkan HTMT. Namun, reliabilitas dan validitas konvergen pada dimensi Religius dan Sosial belum sepenuhnya memenuhi kriteria ideal. Dengan demikian, Instrumen Spiritual Coping Mahasiswa menunjukkan bukti awal yang menjanjikan, tetapi masih memerlukan revisi item dan validasi lanjutan sebelum digunakan secara luas.

Referensi

Aiken, L. R. (1985). THREE COEFFICIENTS FOR ANALYZING THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF RATINGS. Educational And Psychological Measurement.

Baldacchino, D., & Draper, P. (2001). Spiritual coping strategies: a review of the nursing research literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(6), 833–841.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, Volume 6-2018. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Cabaço, S. R., Caldeira, S., Vieira, M., & Rodgers, B. (2018). Spiritual coping: A focus of new nursing diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 29(3), 156–164.

Charzynska, E. (2015). Multidimensional Approach Toward Spiritual Coping : Construction and Validation of the Spiritual Coping Questionnaire (SCQ). J Relig Health, 1629–1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9892-5

Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Psychological Assessment Constructing Validity : New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments Constructing Validity : New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments.

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping : Pitfalls and Promise. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456

Goretzko, David, Siemund, Karik, & Sterner, Philipp. (2024). Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231163813

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J. M. (2025). Covariance ‑ based structural equation modeling ( CB ‑ SEM ): a SmartPLS 4 software tutorial. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 13(3), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00414-6

Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4e éd.). New York, Guilford, 10.

Okan, N., Şahin, Y., Genç, H., & Demirhan, M. (2025). Harnessing spiritual coping to foster resilience: insights from post-trauma mental health after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake. Humanities and Social …. nature.com. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05318-5

Pargament, Kenneth I, Smith, B. W., Koenig, H. G., Perez, L., Smitht, B. W., & Koenigt, H. G. (2013). Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping with Major Life Stressors. 37(4), 710–724.

Pargament, Kenneth Ira. (2012). Religion and Coping: The Current State of Knowledge. The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0014

Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS.

Xu, J. (2016). Pargament ’ s Theory of Religious Coping : Implications for Spiritually Sensitive Social Work Practice. 1394–1410.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-06-25

Cara Mengutip

Validasi Awal Instrumen Spiritual Coping pada Mahasiswa Menggunakan Confirmatory Factor Analysis Berbasis CB-SEM. (2026). Jurnal Psikologi Dan Konseling West Science, 4(02), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpkws.v4i02.3562