Analysis of the Influence of Flight Altitude on the Accuracy of Elevation Derived from UAV-Photogrammetry

Penulis

  • Helik Susilo Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Dandung Novianto Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Trias Rahardianto Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Muhamad Fajar Subkhan Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Martince N Bani Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Muhammad Tri Aditya Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/jgws.v4i02.3398

Kata Kunci:

Elevation, Total Station, UAV-Photogrammetry, Accuracy

Abstrak

Accurate elevation measurement is critical for applications such as construction engineering, land subsidence monitoring, and infrastructure management. Conventional terrestrial surveying using a Total Station provides reliable results but is labor intensive and time consuming. UAV-Photogrammetry offers a more efficient alternative by enabling rapid elevation estimation from aerial imagery acquired by camera equipped unmanned platforms. In this study, aerial photos were collected at three flight altitudes, 25 m, 35 m, and 45 m above ground level (AGL), and elevations derived from UAV-Photogrammetry processing were compared against Total Station measurements. The results demonstrate that imagery captured at 25 m AGL achieved the highest accuracy, with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.0313 m, followed by the 35 m AGL (RMSE = 0.0539 m) and 45 m AGL (RMSE = 0.1118 m). Statistical evaluation using a t-test indicated no significant differences between UAV-Photogrammetry elevations and those obtained from the Total Station.

Referensi

Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., & Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2018). Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: A review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correctionworkflows. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Number 7). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091

Ab Aziz, A. A., Muhammad, M., Sulaiman, S. A., & Tahar, K. N. (2021). Reconstruction of 3D Building Model Using Point of Interest Technique at Different Altitude and Range. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 767(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012010

Burdziakowski, P. (2017). Towards Precise Visual Navigation and Direct Georeferencing for MAV Using ORB-SLAM2. 2017 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2017.21

Burdziakowski, P. (2018). UAV in Todays Photogrammetry ? Application Areas and Challenges. 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2018, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/2.3/S10.031

Chen, S., Zeng, X., Laefer, D. F., Truong-Hong, L., & Mangina, E. (2023). Flight Path Setting and Data Quality Assessments for Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle-Based Photogrammetric Bridge Deck Documentation. Sensors, 23(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167159

Eisenbeiß, H. (2009). UAV Photogrammetry.

Kokamägi, K., Türk, K., & Liba, N. (2020). UAV Photogrammetry for Volume Calculations. Agronomy Research, 18(3), 2087–2102. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.213

Kršák, B., Blišťan, P., Pauliková, A., Puškárová, P., Kovanič, L., Palková, J., & Zelizňaková, V. (2016). Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 91, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.028

Syafuan, W. M., Ismail, N., Idris, A. N., Isa, N. A., Zamili, F. N. Z., & Jelani, J. (2021). Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy in Slope Area with Different Flight Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 767(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012037

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-06-23

Cara Mengutip

Analysis of the Influence of Flight Altitude on the Accuracy of Elevation Derived from UAV-Photogrammetry. (2026). Jurnal Geosains West Science, 4(02), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.58812/jgws.v4i02.3398