Analysis of the Influence of Flight Altitude on the Accuracy of Elevation Derived from UAV-Photogrammetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/jgws.v4i02.3398Kata Kunci:
Elevation, Total Station, UAV-Photogrammetry, AccuracyAbstrak
Accurate elevation measurement is critical for applications such as construction engineering, land subsidence monitoring, and infrastructure management. Conventional terrestrial surveying using a Total Station provides reliable results but is labor intensive and time consuming. UAV-Photogrammetry offers a more efficient alternative by enabling rapid elevation estimation from aerial imagery acquired by camera equipped unmanned platforms. In this study, aerial photos were collected at three flight altitudes, 25 m, 35 m, and 45 m above ground level (AGL), and elevations derived from UAV-Photogrammetry processing were compared against Total Station measurements. The results demonstrate that imagery captured at 25 m AGL achieved the highest accuracy, with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.0313 m, followed by the 35 m AGL (RMSE = 0.0539 m) and 45 m AGL (RMSE = 0.1118 m). Statistical evaluation using a t-test indicated no significant differences between UAV-Photogrammetry elevations and those obtained from the Total Station.
Referensi
Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., & Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2018). Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: A review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correctionworkflows. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Number 7). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091
Ab Aziz, A. A., Muhammad, M., Sulaiman, S. A., & Tahar, K. N. (2021). Reconstruction of 3D Building Model Using Point of Interest Technique at Different Altitude and Range. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 767(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012010
Burdziakowski, P. (2017). Towards Precise Visual Navigation and Direct Georeferencing for MAV Using ORB-SLAM2. 2017 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2017.21
Burdziakowski, P. (2018). UAV in Todays Photogrammetry ? Application Areas and Challenges. 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2018, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/2.3/S10.031
Chen, S., Zeng, X., Laefer, D. F., Truong-Hong, L., & Mangina, E. (2023). Flight Path Setting and Data Quality Assessments for Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle-Based Photogrammetric Bridge Deck Documentation. Sensors, 23(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167159
Eisenbeiß, H. (2009). UAV Photogrammetry.
Kokamägi, K., Türk, K., & Liba, N. (2020). UAV Photogrammetry for Volume Calculations. Agronomy Research, 18(3), 2087–2102. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.213
Kršák, B., Blišťan, P., Pauliková, A., Puškárová, P., Kovanič, L., Palková, J., & Zelizňaková, V. (2016). Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 91, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.028
Syafuan, W. M., Ismail, N., Idris, A. N., Isa, N. A., Zamili, F. N. Z., & Jelani, J. (2021). Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy in Slope Area with Different Flight Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 767(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012037
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Helik Susilo, Dandung Novianto, Trias Rahardianto, Muhamad Fajar Subkhan, Martince N Bani, Muhammad Tri Aditya

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









