A Bibliometric Study of Sustainable Business Practices: Global Trends and Future Directions (2010–2024)

Penulis

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/jbmws.v5i01.3273

Kata Kunci:

Kerja sama akademik global, Jaringan penulis bersama, Kemitraan penelitian, Kerja sama internasional, VOSviewer

Abstrak

Studi ini menganalisis pola kolaborasi akademik global melalui analisis jaringan co-authorship, menggunakan VOSviewer untuk memvisualisasikan keterkaitan negara-negara dalam bidang penelitian dari tahun 2010 hingga 2024. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa negara-negara seperti Amerika Serikat, India, dan Indonesia membentuk pusat kolaborasi utama, dengan jaringan akademik yang kuat di Amerika Utara, Eropa, dan Asia. Wilayah-wilayah ini mendominasi lanskap penelitian global, dengan negara-negara seperti Italia, Prancis, Malaysia, dan Korea Selatan membentuk kluster yang erat terhubung. Analisis juga menyoroti kontribusi akademik yang semakin meningkat dari negara-negara Timur Tengah dan Afrika, menunjukkan peluang yang semakin besar untuk kemitraan penelitian lintas regional. Studi ini menekankan pentingnya kolaborasi internasional dalam mengatasi tantangan global seperti perubahan iklim, kesehatan masyarakat, dan pembangunan ekonomi, serta menyerukan peningkatan infrastruktur penelitian dan pertukaran akademik, terutama di wilayah yang kurang terwakili.

Referensi

Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

Edilia, S., & Larasati, N. D. (2023). Innovative approaches in business development strategies through artificial intelligence technology. IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), 5(1), 84–90.

El-Kassar, A.-N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483–498.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.

Haski-Leventhal, D. (2021). Strategic corporate social responsibility: A holistic approach to responsible and sustainable Business.

Jahid, A., Alsharif, M. H., & Hall, T. J. (2023). The convergence of Blockchain, IoT and 6G: potential, opportunities, challenges and research roadmap. … of Network and Computer Applications.

Meilani Fajarsari, I. (2023). The Mindset of Msme Actors Towards Online Loan Application (Using The Rubicon Model Perspective). American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB), 2(7), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.58631/ajemb.v2i7.47

Melville, N. P. (2010). Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 1–22.

Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722.

Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189–200.

Nordhagen, S., Igbeka, U., Rowlands, H., Shine, R. S., Heneghan, E., & Tench, J. (2021). COVID-19 and small enterprises in the food supply chain: Early impacts and implications for longer-term food system resilience in low- and middle-income countries. World Development, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105405

Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V, & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0?—exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246–264.

Sabry Ahmed Ibrahim, M. (2023). The creative economy and its role in comprehensive development. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies on Management, Business, and Economy, 6(2), 64–87.

Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018). Food waste matters-A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 978–991.

Sood, K., Sharma, V., & Kumar, R. (2024). Unveiling Risks in Decentralized Finance: A Systematic Literature Review. 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Business Practices-2024 (ICETSBP 2024), 320–340.

Wagner, M., & Lutz, E. M. (2017). Sustainability-improving innovation empirical insights and relationships with sustainability-oriented entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Sustainability, 237(July 2010), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351277761-14

Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community1. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

Yildiz, H., Tahali, S., & Trichina, E. (2023). The adoption of the green label by SMEs in the hotel sector: a leverage for reassuring their customers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2023-0160

Unduhan

Dimensions

Diterbitkan

2026-02-28

Cara Mengutip

A Bibliometric Study of Sustainable Business Practices: Global Trends and Future Directions (2010–2024). (2026). Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen West Science, 5(01), 21~31. https://doi.org/10.58812/jbmws.v5i01.3273