Tren Penelitian tentang Gig Economy di Basis Data Scopus (2000 - 2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/jekws.v3i04.2737Kata Kunci:
Gig Economy, Digital Platforms, Platform Work, Employment, Algorithmic Management, Bibliometric Analysis, Scopus Database, Labor Market, Digital Transformation.Abstrak
Dengan menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik kuantitatif, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tren penelitian tentang ekonomi perusahaan yang terindeks dalam basis data Scopus dari tahun 2000 hingga 2025. Setelah data dikumpulkan melalui pencarian kata kunci seperti "ekonomi gig", "pekerjaan digital", dan "platform kerja", perangkat lunak Biblioshiny dan VOSviewer digunakan untuk membandingkan evolusi tematik, kolaborasi antarpenulis, kata kunci, dan pola publikasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penelitian tentang ekonomi kerja telah meningkat pesat sejak 2017. Penelitian telah berkonsentrasi pada masalah ketenagakerjaan, digitalisasi kerja, dan kondisi sosial dan psikologis pekerja. Sementara Amerika Serikat, Inggris, dan China muncul sebagai negara dengan kontribusi penelitian tertinggi, University of Oxford muncul sebagai lembaga dengan jaringan kolaborasi terbesar di seluruh dunia. Secara tematik, fokus penelitian telah berubah dari ekonomi berbagi ke manajemen algoritma dan kesejahteraan pekerja digital. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis untuk perkembangan literatur ekonomi digital dan hubungan industrial modern. Ini juga memberikan implikasi praktis untuk pengelolaan model kerja berbasis platform yang berkelanjutan bagi pembuat kebijakan dan perusahaan.
Referensi
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Betz, F. (1971). On the management of inquiry. Management Science, 18(4-part-i), B-117.
Chaudhary, K., & Alam, M. (2022). Big data analytics: applications in business and marketing. Auerbach Publications.
De Stefano, V. (2015). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J., 37, 471.
di Indonesia, H. (n.d.). Indeks Pembangunan.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132.
Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056.
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162.
Kuhn, K. M., & Maleki, A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 183–200.
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020). Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102171.
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 124–170.
Ragohang, S. S., Santiani, S., Effendi, E., Munawar, B., Endriati, S., Santoso, B., Effendi, H., Khairunisa, Y., Zarvianti, E., & Rahmawati, S. (2024). Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital (Editor: Sarwindi). Mifandi Mandiri Digital.
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328–341.
Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54.
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
Unduhan
Dimensions
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Mohammad Ghofur
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com