Tinjauan Scientometrik atas Integrasi ESG dalam Keuangan Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/jekws.v3i03.2477Kata Kunci:
ESG, Keuangan Islam, Scientometrik, VOSviewerAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis struktur pengetahuan dan tren tematik dalam kajian integrasi Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ke dalam keuangan Islam melalui pendekatan scientometrik. Data diambil dari basis data Scopus untuk periode 2000–2024 dan dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak VOSviewer. Lima visualisasi utama, co-citation, country collaboration, keyword co-occurrence, overlay visualization, dan density map, digunakan untuk mengeksplorasi jaringan intelektual, kolaborasi antar negara, evolusi tematik, dan kepadatan topik dalam literatur ESG. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tokoh-tokoh utama dalam literatur ESG berasal dari akademisi Barat, dengan Amerika Serikat, Cina, Inggris, dan India sebagai pusat kolaborasi ilmiah global. Topik dominan meliputi corporate governance, tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan, dan performa keuangan, sementara topik-topik baru seperti transformasi digital dan kecerdasan buatan mulai bermunculan. Namun, istilah dan pendekatan khas keuangan Islam masih belum menonjol dalam ekosistem literatur ESG global. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya pengembangan kajian ESG yang lebih terintegrasi dengan nilai-nilai syariah dan penguatan kontribusi ilmiah dari negara-negara dengan sistem keuangan Islam.
Referensi
Alda, M. (2021). The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which social responsible investment (SRI) and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126812.
Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z. Z., & Bruno, C. C. (2023). Does sustainability generate better financial performance? review, meta-analysis, and propositions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 802–825.
Burke, J. J. (2022). Do boards take environmental, social, and governance issues seriously? Evidence from media coverage and CEO dismissals. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(4), 647–671.
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
In, S. Y., Rook, D., & Monk, A. (2019). Integrating alternative data (also known as ESG data) in investment decision making. Global Economic Review, 48(3), 237–260.
Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746.
Maniora, J. (2017). Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(4), 755–786.
Sciarelli, M., Cosimato, S., Landi, G., & Iandolo, F. (2021). Socially responsible investment strategies for the transition towards sustainable development: The importance of integrating and communicating ESG. The TQM Journal, 33(7), 39–56.
Sherwood, M. W., & Pollard, J. L. (2018). The risk-adjusted return potential of integrating ESG strategies into emerging market equities. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 8(1), 26–44.
Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525–533.
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Unduhan
Dimensions
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Afri Hasni Putra, Zainur Rafik, Mohammad Gifari Sono
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com